Jargonautica
Agents and Tools

Agent Evaluation

Measuring an agent is harder than measuring a model, because there is no single output to grade. The same task can be completed well or badly by routes that both end in success, and a system that succeeds by luck two thirds of the time is not a system you can deploy.

Technical view

Combines outcome measures, task success against a verifiable end state, with process measures covering tool selection accuracy, step efficiency, cost and recovery from errors. Requires repeated runs per task to estimate variance, since agent behaviour is stochastic and single-run results are uninformative. Environments must be resettable to a known state. Partial credit against sub-goals gives more signal than binary success on long tasks.


Part of AI Terminology Index, section: Agents and Tools.

How it connects

Agent Evaluation links to 7 other terms. The faint lines are links between those terms. See it in the full graph.

EnvironmentEnvironmentAgentAgentTrajectoryTrajectorySimulationSimulationLong-horizon TasksLong-horizon TasksBenchmarks and EvalsBenchmarks and EvalsVariance and Standard DeviationVariance and Standa…Agent Evaluation